The law prohibits the removal of anyone to a country where his or her life or freedom would be threatened on account of race, religion, nationality, political opinions or membership in a social group.
There are several key differences between asylum and withholding of removal. First, withholding of removal is nondiscretionary. If an individual demonstrates qualification for withholding, it must be granted. Second, the standard for obtaining withholding is that it is “more likely than not” that the individual will face persecution if removed. This is defined as a 51% chance of persecution. Thus, the standard is much higher than the “reasonable possibility” standard required in asylum cases. Third, the bars to withholding are narrower than the bars to asylum. The bars include:
A person granted withholding of removal is not granted protection from removal to a third country. Furthermore, a grant of withholding of removal does not result in permanent resident status or the ability to apply for permanent resident status. Although, an individual granted withholding of removal may receive work authorization.
How did we do?
Note: Your review may be shared publicly.