On January 27, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court in a 5-4 vote “stayed,” or effectively ended, the nationwide injunction barring the Government from implementing new public charge rules – rules which are meant to prevent the admission of certain immigrants who are or who are likely to become dependent on public benefits in the United States. As Justice Gorsuch recounts in his concurrence, on October 10, 2018, the Department of Homeland Security began the process of creating this new rule, and, after ten months and over a quarter of a million public comments, finalized that rule. The rule was immediately challenged in courts throughout the country, and injunctions were both granted by district courts and “stayed” by appellate courts in, as Justice Gorsuch calls, a “hodge-podge” of jurisdictions.
Now the Supreme Court has ruled in, and, in a 5-4 vote with all conservative justices voting in favor, the expanded public charge rule is now being allowed to go into effect while litigation is pending – a decision that is guaranteed to have significant consequences for thousands of individuals who would like to come to the United States.
Notable for this rule is its vast scope and, as opponents to the rule argue, its overbroad and discriminatory criteria. Indeed, as the final rule states, numerous public comments were received that “generally stated that the rule creates an ageist system that favors wealthy, healthy, and highly educated individuals.” DHS’s response was only that any negative outcomes that certain groups experience were not the intention of the rule.
Some examples of factors that will be held against applicants for admission include the ability of the applicant to speak English, the age of the applicant, and the health of the applicant. This last factor has led disability rights groups throughout the country to argue against the legality of the rule, as certain laws, such as the Rehabilitation Act, prevent disability discrimination by an executive agency.
The Court battles now continue without the injunction and could take years to finally be resolved. While immigration advocates may be successful in the end, in the interim thousands of people will be affected. For some, this will simply add more administrative burden to the immigration process – more forms to fill out and more hoops to jump through. Others may find themselves outright barred from admission to the United States by this rule.
If you have questions on how the new public charge rule may affect you or a family member, please contact our office to schedule a consultation.
How did we do?
Note: Your review may be shared publicly.
Effective March 25, 2020, in response to “Stay at Home” orders Joseph & Hall PC is closed to the public and is now conducting nearly all of its operations remotely during the COVID-19 health crisis through April 18th.
We continue to have a limited number of staff in our office to perform basic operations such as assembling and filing petitions, receiving and distributing mail and issuing checks. We are grateful to be in a business that is conducive to remote work and for all of your patience and support. Our lawyers and paralegals are here to answer the array of questions that continue to arise daily and will keep you informed during these rapidly changing times. We will hold telephonic or video meetings rather than in-person meetings. These meetings can be done by SKYPE or Zoom Conference call so that you can continue to interact with your legal team, face-to-face.
We remain committed to delivering outstanding client services. We do have one important request – please do not come into the office in person for your health and safety and that of our employees. Please mail or email all documents to our office. Also, you can make any required payments online at https://vpspay.com/p/3 or make them over the phone by calling 303-297-9171 or by mail. Please stay healthy!