On his first day in office, President Biden issued Executive Order 13993, “Revision of Civil Immigration Enforcement Policies and Priorities.” 86 Fed. Reg. 7051 (Jan. 25, 2021). President Biden’s Executive Order revoked a previous executive order by President Trump and called for adherence “to due process of law as we safeguard the dignity and well-being of all families and communities.” The order also announced that the Biden Administration “will reset the policies and practices for enforcing civil immigration laws to align enforcement with these values and priorities.”
In subsequent DHS and ICE memos, the agencies established presumed enforcement priorities for ICE which were meant to guide discretionary enforcement decisions by ICE officers and attorneys.
On August 19, Judge Tipton of the Southern District of Texas preliminarily enjoined the portions of memos including the new enforcement priorities. Texas v. United States, No. 21-00016 (S.D. Texas Aug. 19, 2021). Judge Tipton’s preliminary injunction found that the enjoined sections contravene congressional mandates in the detention statutes at 8 U.S.C. §§ 1226(c) and 1231(a)(2). Prosecutorial discretion decisions not dealing with detention should not have been affected by the injunction. But despite the analysis being limited to purported violation of the detention statutes, the order itself is phrased so broadly that it appears to enjoin DHS from implementing the new enforcement priorities, even in decisions unrelated to detention.
In the immediate wake of the injunction, ICE attorneys informed immigration lawyers that prosecutorial discretion decisions were “on hold” due to the litigation. But then on August 23, Judge Tipton issued a seven day stay on his injunction and then the Office of the Principal Advisor put out guidance clarifying that consideration of prosecutorial discretion would continue, though without reference or reliance on the enjoined priorities.
Instead, ICE attorneys considering exercising prosecutorial discretion are instructed to consider the following factors:
ICE attorneys are instructed to consider prosecutorial discretion on a case-by-case basis considering the totality of the circumstances. Different forms of prosecutorial discretion include agreeing to continuances, stipulating to bond, joining in noncitizen motions to the immigration court, stipulating to relief, declining to appeal, and agreeing to dismiss cases pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1239.2(c).
After a wild week where it first appeared that prosecutorial discretion would be curtailed or eliminated, it is now clear that requests for prosecutorial discretion will be considered by ICE attorneys.
If you would like to schedule a consultation on whether a request for prosecutorial discretion could be advantageous in your immigration case or the case of a loved one, please contact our office at 303-297-9171.
A Biden administration official announced last week that green cards have been processed by the government at such a slow pace that it will come at least 100,000 slots short of…
Joseph & Hall P.C. is a full-service immigration law firm. We pride ourselves on being nationwide experts in all areas of immigration law, including the practice areas listed below. Our attorneys frequently are asked to speak both locally and nationally on a wide variety of immigration topics. For an overview of each practice area, please click the links below. If you have any questions about how these practice areas may apply to your case, please do not hesitate to contact our firm.
Countless people dream of becoming a U.S. citizen. If your application was rejected by the USCIS, we are here to fight for your best interests.
Get in touch with us. Write us a message.