Menu
Search

2013 Supreme Court Decisions Give New Hope to Noncitizens with Certain Criminal Convictions

HomeNews & Events2013 Supreme Court Decisions Give New Hope to Noncitizens with Certain Criminal Convictions
READ FROM US

Immigration News & Events

Categories

Archives

2013 Supreme Court Decisions Give New Hope to Noncitizens with Certain Criminal Convictions

Share This Post: facebooktwitterLinkedIn

Contributed by Aaron Hall, Senior Attorney

Noncitizens with certain criminal convictions may be inadmissible to the U.S., deportable from the U.S., or unable to obtain U.S. citizenship through naturalization.

The categories of criminal convictions which cause immigration problems seem to have been slowly growing over the years as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) argued that more and more crimes fit into these categories. The categories of convictions have not necessarily been growing because of new laws written by Congress, but often because immigration courts have been interpreting existing laws more and more broadly and more and more harshly.

Two U.S. Supreme Court decisions from earlier this year, Descamps v. United States, and Moncrieffe v. Holder, may have been just what were needed to stop the slow and disturbing creep. In Descamps, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that in most cases, the government cannot go beyond the language of the statute of conviction to try to prove that the conviction involved something worse than the words used in the statute itself.

In Moncrieffe, the Supreme Court ruled that a Georgia offense for giving away a small amount of marijuana for no money could not be considered an aggravated felony for immigration law. Like in Descamps, the Moncrieffe decision means that courts must stick strictly to the words of the statute of conviction in applying what is known as “the categorical approach.” In effect, courts and immigration authorities should not be trying to find out what actually happened to get a conviction, but should just be looking at the language of the law that the defendant was convicted of violating.

Though these decisions are still new and the full effect on immigration law is yet to be seen, they undoubtedly open up new lines of argument for many noncitizens with certain criminal convictions who are fighting deportation charges or applying for immigration benefits.

Contributed by Amber Blasingame, Associate Attorney Once again, we are looking into the abyss that we call “government shutdown” with fear and apprehension.  If Congress fails to agree on funding…

25Sep

Contributed by Kim Tremblay, Associate Attorney Immigrants contribute to Colorado in many ways such as by starting businesses, voting and holding office upon naturalizing, and stimulating local economies with their…

27Sep

PERSONAL TOUCH AND SUPERIOR CUSTOMER SERVICE

Recognized Leaders In
Denver Immigration Law.

Joseph & Hall P.C. is a full-service immigration law firm. We pride ourselves on being nationwide experts in all areas of immigration law, including the practice areas listed below. Our attorneys frequently are asked to speak both locally and nationally on a wide variety of immigration topics. For an overview of each practice area, please click the links below. If you have any questions about how these practice areas may apply to your case, please do not hesitate to contact our firm.

OUR AWARDS & ACHIEVEMENTS

We Are Committed to Your Dreams.

Countless people dream of becoming a U.S. citizen. If your application was rejected by the USCIS, we are here to fight for your best interests.

Get in touch with us. Write us a message.

×
Tap Here To Schedule An Appointment
It's Fast & Easy
Call Now Button